Dear @Zaakiy_Siddiqui, I have started to follow you because I am not yet decided if what you posted is from you or from ChatGPT.
What makes me lean toward ChatGPT is
- well formatted 3 steps list with embolden first sentence
- extra explanation of what is a timestamp being a long integer representing … epoch,
- the mentioned of using $toDate (if stored as a string or other format) while in the same post (but in your 2nd edit) you seem to blame @Kushagra_Kesav, for asking clarification. The schema is also clear about the fact that created is already a Date.
- sentences like “in MongoDB, you would typically …”, "MongoDB does not directly …, it sounds funny
- in your 2nd edit, you use OP’s original post, and OP states. OP stands for original post, you use @ for Kushagra_Kesav, I think a human written text would also use @ Bolatan_Ibrahim to talk about OP author
- in you 2nd edit, you quote a set of matched documents in the aggregation, yet you shared an aggregation that does not use $match
What makes me lean for a genuine human written post:
- the error you made in the aggregation, in $group you $avg into the field averageTimestamp but in your last $addFields, you use the non-existing field averagecreatedTimestamp.
Finally, I am like Kushagra_Kesav, I have no clue about the matched documents or the avarage day.