Best Practices for Time Series Collections
On this page
- Optimize Inserts
- Batch Document Writes
- Use Consistent Field Order in Documents
- Increase the Number of Clients
- Optimize Compression
- Omit Fields Containing Empty Objects and Arrays from Documents
- Round Numeric Data to Few Decimal Places
- Optimize Query Performance
- Set Appropriate Bucket Granularity
- Create Secondary Indexes
- Query metaFields on Sub-Fields
- Use $group Instead of Distinct()
This page describes best practices to improve performance and data usage for time series collections.
Optimize Inserts
To optimize insert performance for time series collections, perform the following actions.
Batch Document Writes
When inserting multiple documents:
To avoid network roundtrips, use a single
insertMany()
statement as opposed to multipleinsertOne()
statements.If possible, construct batches to contain multiple measurements per series (as defined by metadata).
To improve performance, set the
ordered
parameter tofalse
.
For example, if you have two sensors, sensor A
and sensor B
, a
batch containing multiple measurements from a single sensor incurs the
cost of one insert, rather than one insert per measurement.
The following operation inserts six documents, but only incurs the cost
of two inserts (one per batch), because the documents are ordered by
sensor. The ordered
parameter is set to false
to improve performance:
db.temperatures.insertMany( [ { "metadata": { "sensor": "sensorA" }, "timestamp": ISODate("2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z"), "temperature": 10 }, { "metadata": { "sensor": "sensorA" }, "timestamp": ISODate("2021-05-19T00:00:00.000Z"), "temperature": 12 }, { "metadata": { "sensor": "sensorA" }, "timestamp": ISODate("2021-05-20T00:00:00.000Z"), "temperature": 13 }, { "metadata": { "sensor": "sensorB" }, "timestamp": ISODate("2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z"), "temperature": 20 }, { "metadata": { "sensor": "sensorB" }, "timestamp": ISODate("2021-05-19T00:00:00.000Z"), "temperature": 25 }, { "metadata": { "sensor": "sensorB" }, "timestamp": ISODate("2021-05-20T00:00:00.000Z"), "temperature": 26 } ], { "ordered": false })
Use Consistent Field Order in Documents
Using a consistent field order in your documents improves insert performance.
For example, inserting these documents achieves optimal insert performance:
{ "_id": ObjectId("6250a0ef02a1877734a9df57"), "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z"), "name": "sensor1", "range": 1 }, { "_id": ObjectId("6560a0ef02a1877734a9df66"), "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T01:00:00.441Z"), "name": "sensor1", "range": 5 }
In contrast, these documents do not achieve optimal insert performance, because their field orders differ:
{ "range": 1, "_id": ObjectId("6250a0ef02a1877734a9df57"), "name": "sensor1", "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z") }, { "_id": ObjectId("6560a0ef02a1877734a9df66"), "name": "sensor1", "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T01:00:00.441Z"), "range": 5 }
Increase the Number of Clients
Increasing the number of clients writing data to your collections can improve performance.
Optimize Compression
To optimize data compression for time series collections, perform the following actions.
Omit Fields Containing Empty Objects and Arrays from Documents
To optimize compression, if your data contains empty objects or arrays, omit the empty fields from your documents.
For example, consider the following documents:
{ "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z"), "coordinates": [1.0, 2.0] }, { "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:10.441Z"), "coordinates": [] }, { "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:20.441Z"), "coordinates": [3.0, 5.0] }
The alternation between coordinates
fields with populated values and
an empty array result in a schema change for the compressor. The schema
change causes the second and third documents in the sequence remain
uncompressed.
In contrast, the following documents where the empty array is omitted receive the benefit of optimal compression:
{ "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z"), "coordinates": [1.0, 2.0] }, { "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:10.441Z") }, { "timestamp": ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:20.441Z"), "coordinates": [3.0, 5.0] }
Round Numeric Data to Few Decimal Places
Round numeric data to the precision required for your application. Rounding numeric data to fewer decimal places improves the compression ratio.
Optimize Query Performance
Set Appropriate Bucket Granularity
When you create a time series collection, MongoDB groups incoming time series data into buckets. By accurately setting granularity, you control how frequently data is bucketed based on the ingestion rate of your data.
Starting in MongoDB 6.3, you can use the custom bucketing parameters
bucketMaxSpanSeconds
and bucketRoundingSeconds
to specify bucket
boundaries and more precisely control how time series data is bucketed.
You can improve performance by setting the granularity
or custom
bucketing parameters to the best match for the time span between
incoming measurements from the same data source. For example, if you are
recording weather data from thousands of sensors but only record data
from each sensor once per 5 minutes, you can either set granularity
to "minutes"
or set the custom bucketing parameters to 300
(seconds).
In this case, setting the granularity
to hours
groups up to a
month's worth of data ingest events into a single bucket, resulting in
longer traversal times and slower queries. Setting it to seconds
leads to multiple buckets per polling interval, many of which
might contain only a single document.
The following table shows the maximum time interval included in one
bucket of data when using a given granularity
value:
granularity | granularity bucket limit |
---|---|
seconds | 1 hour |
minutes | 24 hours |
hours | 30 days |
Create Secondary Indexes
To improve query performance, create one or more secondary indexes on your timeField
and
metaField
to support common query patterns. In versions 6.3 and
higher, MongoDB creates a secondary index on the timeField
and
metaField
automatically.
Query metaFields on Sub-Fields
MongoDB reorders the metaFields of time-series collections, which may cause servers to store data in a different field order than applications. If metaFields are objects, queries on entire metaFields may produce inconsistent results because metaField order may vary between servers and applications. To optimize queries on time-series metaFields, query timeseries metaFields on scalar sub-fields rather than entire metaFields.
The following example creates a time series collection:
db.weather.insertMany( [ { "metaField": { "sensorId": 5578, "type": "temperature" }, "timestamp": ISODate( "2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z" ), "temp": 12 }, { "metaField": { "sensorId": 5578, "type": "temperature" }, "timestamp": ISODate( "2021-05-18T04:00:00.000Z" ), "temp": 11 } ] )
The following query on the sensorId
and type
scalar sub-fields
returns the first document that matches the query criteria:
db.weather.findOne( { "metaField.sensorId": 5578, "metaField.type": "temperature" } )
Example output:
{ _id: ObjectId("6572371964eb5ad43054d572"), metaField: { sensorId: 5578, type: 'temperature' }, timestamp: ISODate( "2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z" ), temp: 12 }
Use $group Instead of Distinct()
Due to the unique data structure of time series collections, MongoDB can't
efficiently index them for distinct values. Avoid using the
distinct
command or db.collection.distinct()
helper
method on time series collections. Instead, use a $group
aggregation to group documents by distinct values.
For example, to query for distinct meta.type
values on documents
where meta.project = 10
, instead of:
db.foo.distinct("meta.type", {"meta.project": 10})
Use:
db.foo.createIndex({"meta.project":1, "meta.type":1}) db.foo.aggregate([{$match: {"meta.project": 10}}, {$group: {_id: "$meta.type"}}])
This works as follows:
Creating a compound index on
meta.project
andmeta.type
and supports the aggregation.The
$match
stage filters for documents wheremeta.project = 10
.The
$group
stage usesmeta.type
as the group key to output one document per unique value.